What does expedient mean in civil disobedience?

What are the two primary arguments that support the use of civil disobedience?

Thoreau contends that there are two sets of laws: the lower laws that mankind have created, and the higher laws that God and humans have created together. If the laws that humans have created are unfair, then people have the absolute right to disobey those laws.

What are the three different ways that civil disobedience can be carried out?

Which of the following best represents one method by which civil disobedience is practiced?

The following statement serves as the appropriate response to this question: “It strengthened the beliefs of those who thought the government acted unfairly.” The statement that best describes one of the ways in which “Civil Disobedience” that impacted people and events later on in history is that it helps fortify the beliefs of those people that they thought… This is the statement that best describes one of the ways in which “Civil Disobedience” that impacted people and events later on in history.

What was the most significant act of disobedience that Henry David Thoreau committed during his own life?

In his own life, what was the most significant act of disobedience that Henry David Thoreau committed? Refuse to pay taxes.

What aspects of transcendentalism can be seen in the act of civil disobedience?

What aspects of Transcendentalist thought are reflected in the practice of Civil Disobedience? It places an emphasis on the individual’s capacity to evaluate the behavior of the government.

What’s the meaning of Malapropos?

: in an inappropriate or inopportune way.

In what way does Thoreau envision the ideal form of government?

According to Thoreau, the ideal form of government is one that does not exercise any authority at all. All human organizations, including governments, are inherently tainted by corruption due to the nature of the species.

What does unwise mean?

: lacking wisdom or good sense : Irrational and rash behavior.

Explain what Thoreau means by the terms expedient and inexpedient, including instances of how these terms are used in modern culture to back up your claims.

The usage of the terms “expedient” and “inexpedient” by Thoreau gives the impression that he is suspicious and critical of the government. When he states that the government is “at best merely an expedient” (part 1, paragraph 1), he is implying that it is only able to provide a solution to a problem or accomplish a goal in specific circumstances, but that it is unable to do anything else.

What exactly does it mean when we say that the standing army is just an arm of the standing government?

… “Governments show thus how successfully men can be imposed on, even impose on themselves, for their own advantage. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government,” which he is trying to get across that the army that the people think of as “the government” is only a small piece to the whole.

What does it mean that governments are, at best, expedient, but that the majority of governments are, typically, and that all governments can be inexpedient at times?

He states in part 1 paragraph… that the government is “at best simply an expedient.” Thoreau argues further that “most governments are typically inexpedient, and all governments are occasionally inexpedient.” This indicates that, for the most part, governmental systems are neither appropriate nor desirable.

What is the overarching message that Thoreau wants readers to take away from Civil Disobedience?

Individual conscience and action, right and unjust laws, and democracy in the United States are some of the primary topics that are discussed in “Civil Disobedience.” Individual responsibility and action: Thoreau places a strong emphasis on the significance of the discernment of each citizen when it comes to determining the appropriate way to go.

Who is well-known for their acts of civil disobedience?

Civil disobedience was a strategy that was utilized by activists in the American civil rights movement during the 1950s and 1960s. These activists included Martin Luther King Jr., James Bevel, Rosa Parks, and others.

Who is it that believes in disobeying the laws of the land?

While the Beats’ methods are partly analogous to Ezra Pound’s, the latter’s views in civic disobedience served as an inspiration for the former.

Why should people engage in acts of civil disobedience?

Many people believe that civil disobedience is a useful tool in the fight against cruelty and injustice. It gives individuals the ability to assist others by taking a position against those who oppress them. It affords them the chance to make someone else’s life more equitable and just by giving them a shot at living. People were able to put an end to slavery in the United States and the conflicts in Mexico as a result of it.

Why should people not engage in civil disobedience?

The most important finding can be summed up as follows in this lecture: Civil disobedience is justifiable but risky. It is risky because it poses a threat to the rule of law, but it is permissible according to the founding ideals of the American republic and of free constitutional governance in the United States, provided that the circumstances call for it.

What are the many forms of disobedience against the law?

The courts have established a distinction between two distinct sorts of civil disobedience: “Indirect civil disobedience entails breaching a law that is not, itself, the goal of protest,” and “direct civil disobedience involves opposing the existence of a particular law by breaking that law.”

What are the four different ways that civil disobedience can be carried out?

Is civic disobedience illegal?

In its most basic form, civil disobedience can be defined as any politically motivated act of non-violent defiance against the law.

Is it still effective to disobey the law in the name of a cause?

Civil disobedience that does not resort to violence is an effective strategy because it draws attention to the injustice that a group believes exists within an institution while also directly appealing to the many ethical frameworks held by individual citizens.