\ Can evidence from an experiment be explained in relationship to the hypothesis? - Dish De

Can evidence from an experiment be explained in relationship to the hypothesis?

This is a question our experts keep getting from time to time. Now, we have got the complete detailed explanation and answer for everyone, who is interested!

Excellent theories provide accurate predictions, while bad theories generate inaccurate projections… The findings of the experiments provided support for the hypothesis of the periodic theory, to the extent that it is now regarded not only as a theory that explains things but also as a law whose predictions always come true. This is because the hypothesis of the periodic theory was supported by the evidence obtained from the experiments.

How does one go about testing a hypothesis? What is the connection between the two?

An experiment is a method of putting a hypothesis to the test, which is the primary distinction that can be made between a hypothesis and an experiment. A hypothesis might be thought of as a prediction. You hypothesize that if you alter one factor (referred to here as the independent variable), the other factor (referred to here as the dependent variable) would also alter.

Do the findings of an experiment need to agree with the hypothesis in order to be considered valid?

The most that can be said is that your findings PROVIDE SUPPORT for the initial hypothesis. You shouldn’t alter the hypothesis, even if the final outcomes of your experiment don’t fit with what you expected them to be based on your original hypothesis.

Where does the conclusion fit into the bigger picture of the hypothesis?

Explanation: The ability to conduct tests is one of the hallmarks of a sound hypothesis…. And last, a conclusion is reached AFTER the experiment has been carried out, and it discusses whether or not the findings of the experiment supported the initial premise…

If an experiment does not provide evidence to support the hypothesis, what does this mean?

Explanation If the data do not support the hypothesis in a consistent manner, then IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE HYPOTHESIS IS NOT A REASONABLE EXPLANATION OF WHAT YOU ARE INVESTIGATING. The hypothesis is disproved, and at this point we are looking for a different interpretation or another hypothesis that can account for the results of the experiments.

Comparison of Reality to Theory to Hypothesis to Law… EXPLAINED!

38 related questions found

What course of action should one take if a series of experiments does not provide evidence to support a hypothesis?

Developing an Alternative Hypothesis

If the initial hypothesis is not supported by the data, you will need to come up with a new answer to the question as well as a different method to test it. In the event that your theory is confirmed, you should consider ways to improve it and put those improvements to the test.

Are there any applications for data that contradict a hypothesis?

If the data DO NOT in any way, shape, or form support the hypothesis, then it is OBVIOUS that the hypothesis is NOT a credible explanation of what it is that you are looking at. The hypothesis is disproved, and at this point we are looking for a different interpretation or another hypothesis that can account for the results of the experiments.

What exactly is an illustration of the hypothesis?

Some Illustrations of Hypothesis:
  • Changing the battery in my car will result in improved gas mileage because it will run more efficiently.
  • If I up my intake of vegetables, I should be able to speed up my weight loss.
  • If I apply fertilizer to my garden, then the plants will mature and grow more quickly.
  • If I clean my teeth twice a day, I will significantly reduce my risk of developing cavities.

What exactly is the difference between a hypothesis and a conclusion?

Statements That Are Conditional

The hypothesis is the initial portion of a conditional statement, sometimes known as the “if” part. The conclusion is the second portion of a conditional statement, sometimes known as the “then” part. The conclusion is reached as a consequence of testing the hypothesis.

Can you give me an illustration of a conclusion?

If you were to write a paper about the animals in the zoo, for instance, you would generally devote one paragraph to discussing a single animal. In your conclusion, you should make a passing reference to every animal one more. Amazing creatures can be found in zoos, including polar bears, lions, and giraffes, among others. Give your readers something to ponder after they’ve finished reading.

What are the seven steps of the scientific method?

The scientific process broken down into its seven steps
  • Ask a question.
  • Carry out some study.
  • Provide a foundation for your hypothesis.
  • Do an experiment to see if your hypothesis holds up under scrutiny.
  • Make a remark about what you noticed.
  • Do an analysis, and then make a determination based on what you find.
  • Provide a presentation on the findings.

The scientific process consists of ten steps. What are they?

Uncover the Secret to This Answer Now
  • Get an Understanding of the Issue.
  • Get as much data as possible.
  • Create a hypothesis and test it.
  • Investigate the Theory.
  • Maintain Correct Record.
  • Examine the Outcomes.
  • Repeat Experiment.
  • Confirmation of the conclusion

How should the steps of the scientific method be sequenced in the correct order?

The scientific method consists of six steps in total, including five fundamental steps and one feedback step:
  • Make a remark about what you noticed.
  • Ask a question.
  • Create a hypothesis, often known as an explanation that can be tested.
  • Create a hypothesis-based prediction using the information provided.
  • Put the forecast to the test.
  • Repeat the process while incorporating the previous steps’ findings into your new hypotheses or forecasts.

Why is it necessary for a hypothesis to be able to be debunked?

If it is conceivable to conceive of an experimental observation that contradicts the theory that is being questioned, then the hypothesis or model in question is said to be falsifiable. All too frequently, scientists come up with hypotheses that cannot be verified by experiments the outcomes of which have the potential to demonstrate that the concept being investigated is incorrect.

Can you give me an example of an experimental hypothesis?

For instance, a study that was designed to investigate the connection between insufficient sleep and poor test performance could have a hypothesis that reads as follows: “This study is designed to assess the hypothesis that sleep-deprived people will perform worse on a test than individuals who are not sleep-deprived.”

What is an illustration of a hypothesis that can be tested?

For instance, Michael has seen that maple trees shed their leaves throughout the autumn season. He can then offer a probable explanation for this observation, which might go something like this: “In the fall, maple trees lose their leaves because cold weather forces them to.” This assertion can be put to the test.

How can you tell the difference between a hypothesis and a conclusion?

The term that comes immediately after the word “if” in a conditional statement is considered to be the statement’s hypothesis. The sentence that comes immediately after the word then in a conditional statement is considered to be the statement’s conclusion. The intersection of the two lines results in a right angle. The lines can be concluded to be perpendicular to one another.

In the context of the scientific process, what does it mean to draw a conclusion?

A statement that is derived from experimental measurements and observations is known as a conclusion. It includes a summary of the results, an evaluation of whether or not the hypothesis was supported, an analysis of the relevance of the study, and recommendations for further investigation.

What can we deduce from the results of the hypothesis test?

The conclusion represents the ultimate verdict reached after testing the hypothesis. In every case, the conclusion has to be presented unequivocally, and it has to communicate the judgment that was reached based on the aspects of the test. It is essential to understand that the null hypothesis is never proven or accepted in scientific research.

Which of the following is the most compelling illustration of a hypothesis?

The answer is yes, dear, provided that the plant has access to air, water, and sunlight. In support of the idea, the growth of a plant is contingent upon its receipt of water.

What is a good illustration of the concept of a hypothesis?

The following is an illustration of a hypothesis: Corn plants will produce more new leaves each day if you lengthen the amount of time that they are exposed to light. The hypothesis identifies two variables: the amount of time that a plant is exposed to light and the rate at which it grows. It is possible to design an experiment to investigate whether or not the amount of time exposed to light influences the pace of growth.

Is a forecast the same thing as a hypothesis?

In the realm of scientific inquiry, the only use of the word “hypothesis” that is acceptable is “causal hypothesis,” which is defined as “a proposed explanation.” A forecast is not the same thing as a hypothesis. A forecast, on the other hand, is developed from a hypothesis.

What kind of evidence is required to either support or refute a theory, and how may this evidence be gathered?

Hypotheses are claims that can be put to the test and proven to be true or false based on the evidence that is gathered from observations. In scientific writing, “if…then” phrases make up a significant portion of hypotheses.

Does the evidence point in the direction of the hypothesis?

If the results are consistent with the hypothesis, then we can consider the hypothesis to have been validated and to be accurate. If the data, on the other hand, do not support or disprove the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is in difficulty, and we will need to devise a replacement hypothesis in order to explain the observations.

When data fail to provide support for a hypothesis, does this automatically indicate that the hypothesis is incorrect?

It is by no means a failure if your data do not support your hypothesis; in fact, that can be more interesting than the other way around, because you may find a new perspective for looking at the data. If your data do not support your hypothesis, that does not mean that your experiment was a failure. In science, it is not uncommon to find that hypotheses are not supported, and this finding is frequently used as a jumping off point for future studies.