This is a question our experts keep getting from time to time. Now, we have got the complete detailed explanation and answer for everyone, who is interested!
In most legal systems, a person’s fingerprints are accepted as a kind of forensic evidence…. In order to make an accurate comparison between a suspect’s fingerprint and one obtained at the site of the crime, it is important to collect a full print from the suspect.
Do fingerprints serve as proof of an individual or a group?
Blood type, fibers, and paint are all types of evidence that can be used to classify people. Individual characteristics are aspects of a piece of physical evidence that, with a high degree of confidence, can be traced back to a single origin as having originated from the same place. Anything that contains nuclear DNA, toolmarks, or fingerprints are all types of evidence that can be considered independent pieces of evidence.
Why are fingerprints not considered Class evidence but rather Individual evidence?
The distinctive ridges that are found on each piece of evidence are what make each one unique. It’s about being consistent across the course of a person’s life. During the course of an individual’s life, nothing changes about it. Fingertips are categorized according to their general characteristic ridge patterns for the purpose of the systematic classification.
An Expert in Forensics Breaks Out the Steps Need to Remove Fingerprints | WIRED
15 related questions found